<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, dismissing the disallowance under Section 14A by applying Rule 8D(iii) but allowing the disallowance of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia). The decision was pronounced in Chennai on April 26, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 08:39:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, dismissing the disallowance under Section 14A by applying Rule 8D(iii) but allowing the disallowance of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia). The decision was pronounced in Chennai on April 26, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>