<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1168 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328187</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, quashing the penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, respectively. The tribunal emphasized the bona fide nature of the transactions, the reasonable cause, and the absence of tax evasion or unaccounted income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1168 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328187</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, quashing the penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, respectively. The tribunal emphasized the bona fide nature of the transactions, the reasonable cause, and the absence of tax evasion or unaccounted income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>