<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1166 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328185</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, a charitable institution. The court held that the town development and works expenditure incurred by the Improvement Trust qualified for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. Citing legal precedents, the court emphasized that the expenditure was in line with the charitable objects of the appellant, entitling them to the benefit of section 11(1)(a) for the expenditure on charitable purposes. The court found no dispute over the legal position and factual background, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1166 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328185</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in refiling the appeal and ruled in favor of the appellant-assessee, a charitable institution. The court held that the town development and works expenditure incurred by the Improvement Trust qualified for exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act. Citing legal precedents, the court emphasized that the expenditure was in line with the charitable objects of the appellant, entitling them to the benefit of section 11(1)(a) for the expenditure on charitable purposes. The court found no dispute over the legal position and factual background, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>