<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1165 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328184</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the land sold qualified as agricultural land and was situated beyond the municipal limits, exempting it from capital gains tax. The Court affirmed the competency of the Tehsildar to issue certificates regarding the land&#039;s distance from the municipal limits and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s objections. The judgment emphasized that the land&#039;s classification as agricultural depended on its use and location, not on the landowner&#039;s profession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1165 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328184</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the land sold qualified as agricultural land and was situated beyond the municipal limits, exempting it from capital gains tax. The Court affirmed the competency of the Tehsildar to issue certificates regarding the land&#039;s distance from the municipal limits and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s objections. The judgment emphasized that the land&#039;s classification as agricultural depended on its use and location, not on the landowner&#039;s profession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>