<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1161 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the lack of tangible material for income escapement, rejection of documentary evidence without due process, and failure to independently determine the validity of the reassessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was guided by legal precedents and the requirement for an independent assessment by the Authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 08:38:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1161 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the reassessment proceedings and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The decision was based on the lack of tangible material for income escapement, rejection of documentary evidence without due process, and failure to independently determine the validity of the reassessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was guided by legal precedents and the requirement for an independent assessment by the Authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>