<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1157 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting additions totaling to over Rs. 38 million and overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of providing cogent evidence in tax assessments and rejected the Revenue&#039;s unsubstantiated assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2016 08:38:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1157 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting additions totaling to over Rs. 38 million and overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of providing cogent evidence in tax assessments and rejected the Revenue&#039;s unsubstantiated assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>