<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1023 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183071</link>
    <description>A preliminary order in a civil suit did not itself amount to a decree, and the availability of an appeal from the final decree meant the earlier finding could still be examined in that appellate forum. The revision and supervisory challenge were therefore not treated as finally barred merely because they concerned a preliminary issue, and the High Court should not ordinarily have gone into the merits after finding the revision not maintainable. The earlier finding also did not operate as an absolute res judicata bar in the pending appellate proceedings. The matter was sent back for fresh composite consideration by the High Court along with the pending appeal and connected applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1023 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183071</link>
      <description>A preliminary order in a civil suit did not itself amount to a decree, and the availability of an appeal from the final decree meant the earlier finding could still be examined in that appellate forum. The revision and supervisory challenge were therefore not treated as finally barred merely because they concerned a preliminary issue, and the High Court should not ordinarily have gone into the merits after finding the revision not maintainable. The earlier finding also did not operate as an absolute res judicata bar in the pending appellate proceedings. The matter was sent back for fresh composite consideration by the High Court along with the pending appeal and connected applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>