<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1085 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183059</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the trade liability could be added to the appellant&#039;s total income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as M/s Tirupati Steels, the creditor, was found to be non-existent at the provided address. The appellant&#039;s failure to prove the liability&#039;s genuineness led to the addition under Section 41(1). The Court found no substantial legal question, allowing the assessing authority to verify the discharge of the liability. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1085 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183059</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the trade liability could be added to the appellant&#039;s total income under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as M/s Tirupati Steels, the creditor, was found to be non-existent at the provided address. The appellant&#039;s failure to prove the liability&#039;s genuineness led to the addition under Section 41(1). The Court found no substantial legal question, allowing the assessing authority to verify the discharge of the liability. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>