<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1136 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to treat sales tax and excise incentives as capital receipts. The Tribunal also instructed the exclusion of the debt redemption fund from the book profit calculation under Section 115JB. Emphasizing the &#039;purpose test&#039; in subsidy analysis, the Tribunal upheld higher judicial precedents&#039; binding nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1136 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Assessing Officer&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to treat sales tax and excise incentives as capital receipts. The Tribunal also instructed the exclusion of the debt redemption fund from the book profit calculation under Section 115JB. Emphasizing the &#039;purpose test&#039; in subsidy analysis, the Tribunal upheld higher judicial precedents&#039; binding nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>