<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1115 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and upholding the assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal held that deductions for depreciation and interest are permissible even in cases of estimated income, emphasizing that the provisions of section 44AD do not restrict deductions post-estimation, especially when turnover exceeds the prescribed limit. This decision overturned the CIT&#039;s order, deeming the assessment orders not erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interests, in line with established legal precedents and High Court decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 09:35:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1115 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, setting aside the CIT&#039;s order and upholding the assessment orders passed by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Tribunal held that deductions for depreciation and interest are permissible even in cases of estimated income, emphasizing that the provisions of section 44AD do not restrict deductions post-estimation, especially when turnover exceeds the prescribed limit. This decision overturned the CIT&#039;s order, deeming the assessment orders not erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interests, in line with established legal precedents and High Court decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>