<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183037</link>
    <description>The appeals involved a dispute over the imposition of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for incorrect deduction claims under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05. The CIT(A) and ITAT Delhi Bench &quot;C&quot; both ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalties due to the bona fide nature of the claim and conflicting High Court opinions regarding the deduction&#039;s allowability. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for all years were dismissed, and the penalties were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 16:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1201 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183037</link>
      <description>The appeals involved a dispute over the imposition of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for incorrect deduction claims under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05. The CIT(A) and ITAT Delhi Bench &quot;C&quot; both ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the penalties due to the bona fide nature of the claim and conflicting High Court opinions regarding the deduction&#039;s allowability. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals for all years were dismissed, and the penalties were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>