<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183030</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendants are not required to deduct tax at source on the interest component of the decree. The court distinguished previous cases cited by the defendants, emphasizing that once a decree is passed, it should be discharged without TDS deduction. The court stated that the tax liability issue can be addressed by the Income-tax authorities after payment to the decree holder.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 15:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183030</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendants are not required to deduct tax at source on the interest component of the decree. The court distinguished previous cases cited by the defendants, emphasizing that once a decree is passed, it should be discharged without TDS deduction. The court stated that the tax liability issue can be addressed by the Income-tax authorities after payment to the decree holder.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>