<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3619</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the 2nd respondent not to proceed with the auction or take coercive steps during the pendency of the petitioner&#039;s stay petition. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the stay petition&#039;s hearing and make appropriate orders. The judgment upholds natural justice principles by protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights and ensuring due process until a final decision is made by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 24 - HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3619</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the 2nd respondent not to proceed with the auction or take coercive steps during the pendency of the petitioner&#039;s stay petition. The Tribunal was instructed to expedite the stay petition&#039;s hearing and make appropriate orders. The judgment upholds natural justice principles by protecting the petitioner&#039;s rights and ensuring due process until a final decision is made by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>