<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 780 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183027</link>
    <description>In estimating business income where books of account are absent, the rate must be fixed on the material relevant to the assessment year in question, and an earlier year&#039;s accepted rate does not mechanically control the later year. The Andhra Pradesh HC upheld the 4% profit estimate because the record did not justify applying the higher prior-year rate. It also held that depreciation must be allowed separately when income is estimated, unless the estimation expressly includes that allowance. The appellate order was therefore sustained, with estimated income at 4% and depreciation separately deducted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 14:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 780 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183027</link>
      <description>In estimating business income where books of account are absent, the rate must be fixed on the material relevant to the assessment year in question, and an earlier year&#039;s accepted rate does not mechanically control the later year. The Andhra Pradesh HC upheld the 4% profit estimate because the record did not justify applying the higher prior-year rate. It also held that depreciation must be allowed separately when income is estimated, unless the estimation expressly includes that allowance. The appellate order was therefore sustained, with estimated income at 4% and depreciation separately deducted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>