<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 981 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183022</link>
    <description>Transport charges for single-trip carriage arranged through intermediaries did not attract tax deduction at source where no direct contract existed between the payer and transporters; each goods receipt was treated as a separate contract, so disallowance for non-deduction was deleted. Interest paid on deposits by a resident partner in an individual capacity remained subject to tax deduction at source. Partner status in another capacity did not create an exemption; failure to deduct tax resulted in disallowance of the interest expenditure. The transport-charge claim succeeded, while the interest disallowance and consequential levy issues remained sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 12:57:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 981 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183022</link>
      <description>Transport charges for single-trip carriage arranged through intermediaries did not attract tax deduction at source where no direct contract existed between the payer and transporters; each goods receipt was treated as a separate contract, so disallowance for non-deduction was deleted. Interest paid on deposits by a resident partner in an individual capacity remained subject to tax deduction at source. Partner status in another capacity did not create an exemption; failure to deduct tax resulted in disallowance of the interest expenditure. The transport-charge claim succeeded, while the interest disallowance and consequential levy issues remained sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>