<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the failure to deposit unutilized capital gains in a specified account was a technical default and should not disqualify the appellant from exemption under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Emphasizing the appellant&#039;s intention and actual investment in a residential house within the required period, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing that the entire capital gains be exempt under Section 54.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 275 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the failure to deposit unutilized capital gains in a specified account was a technical default and should not disqualify the appellant from exemption under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Emphasizing the appellant&#039;s intention and actual investment in a residential house within the required period, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing that the entire capital gains be exempt under Section 54.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=183019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>