<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1094 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to immunity under clause (2) of Explanation (5) of Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as they met the necessary conditions. Consequently, the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:18:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1094 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellants were entitled to immunity under clause (2) of Explanation (5) of Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as they met the necessary conditions. Consequently, the penalties imposed by the Assessing Officer were deemed unsustainable. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>