<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1091 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmation of a minimum penalty of Rs. 3,90,456 under section 271(1)(c) for income concealment. The Tribunal found that while the additions made by the Revenue were valid, they failed to adequately verify the evidence provided by the assessee, including confirmation letters from creditors. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustifiable, leading to its deletion in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:18:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1091 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the confirmation of a minimum penalty of Rs. 3,90,456 under section 271(1)(c) for income concealment. The Tribunal found that while the additions made by the Revenue were valid, they failed to adequately verify the evidence provided by the assessee, including confirmation letters from creditors. As a result, the penalty was deemed unjustifiable, leading to its deletion in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>