<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the computation of income from the vacant property. The AO was instructed to consider evidence regarding the property&#039;s habitable condition and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating the property&#039;s habitability for proper tax treatment, leading to a de novo determination by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 08:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to reassess the computation of income from the vacant property. The AO was instructed to consider evidence regarding the property&#039;s habitable condition and provide a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evaluating the property&#039;s habitability for proper tax treatment, leading to a de novo determination by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>