https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328103 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions in the case, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. It found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s orders and sustained the disallowance of 20% of payments made to subcontractors. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 50,000 on account of the sale of scrap, as the assessee failed to provide evidence to contest the findings. The Tribunal noted similarities with the preceding year's case and found the CIT(A)'s decisions reasonable and in line with the facts presented. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 May 2016 08:18:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328103 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions in the case, dismissing the appeal of the assessee. It found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s orders and sustained the disallowance of 20% of payments made to subcontractors. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 50,000 on account of the sale of scrap, as the assessee failed to provide evidence to contest the findings. The Tribunal noted similarities with the preceding year's case and found the CIT(A)'s decisions reasonable and in line with the facts presented. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328103