<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1077 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328096</link>
    <description>Outdoor catering services provided under a statutory obligation and staff transportation services used in connection with manufacture were treated as input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because they were integrally connected with business activity and their cost formed part of the cost of production. The later exclusion of such services was held inapplicable to the period in dispute, as it took effect only from 01.04.2011. On that basis, denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable and credit was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 22:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1077 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328096</link>
      <description>Outdoor catering services provided under a statutory obligation and staff transportation services used in connection with manufacture were treated as input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because they were integrally connected with business activity and their cost formed part of the cost of production. The later exclusion of such services was held inapplicable to the period in dispute, as it took effect only from 01.04.2011. On that basis, denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable and credit was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>