<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1073 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328092</link>
    <description>Where the factual sequence shows a continuous manufacturing chain through job work, prior reversal of credit, and later testing and packing before export, CENVAT credit remains admissible. The assessee had received inputs, manufactured castings, routed them through machining and other job workers, and cleared the final goods after duty-paid movements without claiming credit twice. The court treated the later testing and packing as part of the same manufacturing process and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that entitlement to credit was not broken by the final export stage. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the assessee&#039;s credit claim was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1073 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328092</link>
      <description>Where the factual sequence shows a continuous manufacturing chain through job work, prior reversal of credit, and later testing and packing before export, CENVAT credit remains admissible. The assessee had received inputs, manufactured castings, routed them through machining and other job workers, and cleared the final goods after duty-paid movements without claiming credit twice. The court treated the later testing and packing as part of the same manufacturing process and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s view that entitlement to credit was not broken by the final export stage. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the assessee&#039;s credit claim was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>