<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 33 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3607</link>
    <description>The judgment clarified that the services provided by the appellants to the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board fell under the category of Information Technology Service rather than Business Auxiliary Service. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants from the imposed tax and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 33 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3607</link>
      <description>The judgment clarified that the services provided by the appellants to the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board fell under the category of Information Technology Service rather than Business Auxiliary Service. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, granting relief to the appellants from the imposed tax and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>