<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1068 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the cenvat credit on outward transportation of final products for export. The decision was based on the finding that the freight charges for such transportation were integral to the manufacturing process and fell within the definition of &quot;input services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal also considered the appellant&#039;s compliance with the CBEC Circular and rejected the notion that the place of removal for export transactions should be the factory gate, instead favoring the customer&#039;s premises. Various case laws supporting the appellant&#039;s position were compared, emphasizing the importance of maintaining competitiveness in global markets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1068 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the cenvat credit on outward transportation of final products for export. The decision was based on the finding that the freight charges for such transportation were integral to the manufacturing process and fell within the definition of &quot;input services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal also considered the appellant&#039;s compliance with the CBEC Circular and rejected the notion that the place of removal for export transactions should be the factory gate, instead favoring the customer&#039;s premises. Various case laws supporting the appellant&#039;s position were compared, emphasizing the importance of maintaining competitiveness in global markets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>