https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328079 The appeal challenged the revocation of the custom house agent license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to discrepancies in imported goods. The appellant argued against the order, citing lack of statements and cross-examination opportunities, and delays in proceedings. The appellant contested violations of Custom House Agent Licensing Regulation, 2004, emphasizing adherence to prescribed time limits. The delay in proceedings beyond specified limits rendered the order legally unsustainable and was set aside. The penalty imposed on the appellant was overturned based on non-maintenance of time limits and implications of the main importer's settlement. en-us Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 May 2016 08:13:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328079 The appeal challenged the revocation of the custom house agent license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to discrepancies in imported goods. The appellant argued against the order, citing lack of statements and cross-examination opportunities, and delays in proceedings. The appellant contested violations of Custom House Agent Licensing Regulation, 2004, emphasizing adherence to prescribed time limits. The delay in proceedings beyond specified limits rendered the order legally unsustainable and was set aside. The penalty imposed on the appellant was overturned based on non-maintenance of time limits and implications of the main importer's settlement. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328079