<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1057 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328076</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Board&#039;s order and granting the petitioner benefits concerning the disputed C-forms, directing the assessing authority to adjust the demand accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of co-relating C-forms with invoices and the need for flexibility in such matters to ensure fair adjudication and benefit entitlement for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2016 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1057 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328076</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, setting aside the Board&#039;s order and granting the petitioner benefits concerning the disputed C-forms, directing the assessing authority to adjust the demand accordingly. The judgment emphasized the importance of co-relating C-forms with invoices and the need for flexibility in such matters to ensure fair adjudication and benefit entitlement for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>