https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182996 The SC dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant did not provide credible evidence to prove he was under 21 at the time of the offense. The court clarified that the relevant date for applying Section 6 of the Probation of Offenders Act is the date of the trial court's judgment, not the offense date. Additionally, the SC held that new arguments regarding age and the applicability of Section 6 should not be introduced at the appellate stage without credible evidence. This decision highlights the necessity of presenting all pertinent evidence during the trial. en-us Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Dec 2023 18:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182996 The SC dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellant did not provide credible evidence to prove he was under 21 at the time of the offense. The court clarified that the relevant date for applying Section 6 of the Probation of Offenders Act is the date of the trial court's judgment, not the offense date. Additionally, the SC held that new arguments regarding age and the applicability of Section 6 should not be introduced at the appellate stage without credible evidence. This decision highlights the necessity of presenting all pertinent evidence during the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182996