<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 980 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 80IB for the entire profit derived from the industrial undertaking, despite disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for delayed TDS deposit and non-deposit of TDS on commission expenses. The fear of double deduction expressed by the Commissioner was deemed unfounded, as the disallowance of business expenditure increased eligible unit profits, making the assessee eligible for the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 16:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 980 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow deduction under section 80IB for the entire profit derived from the industrial undertaking, despite disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for delayed TDS deposit and non-deposit of TDS on commission expenses. The fear of double deduction expressed by the Commissioner was deemed unfounded, as the disallowance of business expenditure increased eligible unit profits, making the assessee eligible for the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>