<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (3) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182989</link>
    <description>Rules 2 and 6 of the Income-tax Rules, framed under the special registration scheme for firms, required the application for registration or renewal to be personally signed by all partners, and a duly authorised agent could not sign in their place. The rules were upheld as valid because the parent Act empowered rule-making on the person by whom the application was to be made and the manner of verification, and a special taxing statute could lawfully require personal compliance for the statutory privilege of registration. The general law of agency under the Powers-of-Attorney Act did not override these specific rules, so the provisions were not ultra vires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 16:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (3) TMI 31 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182989</link>
      <description>Rules 2 and 6 of the Income-tax Rules, framed under the special registration scheme for firms, required the application for registration or renewal to be personally signed by all partners, and a duly authorised agent could not sign in their place. The rules were upheld as valid because the parent Act empowered rule-making on the person by whom the application was to be made and the manner of verification, and a special taxing statute could lawfully require personal compliance for the statutory privilege of registration. The general law of agency under the Powers-of-Attorney Act did not override these specific rules, so the provisions were not ultra vires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>