<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1465 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182971</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the 1st respondent to reassess the petitioner in accordance with the law, specifically focusing on the allowance and carrying forward of depreciation. The court highlighted the importance of accurately calculating the remaining amount to ascertain the tax liability, while keeping all issues open for further discussions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1465 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182971</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the 1st respondent to reassess the petitioner in accordance with the law, specifically focusing on the allowance and carrying forward of depreciation. The court highlighted the importance of accurately calculating the remaining amount to ascertain the tax liability, while keeping all issues open for further discussions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>