<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1051 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments insufficient for a full waiver of pre-deposit of a significant Service Tax liability and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant was directed to pay a specified amount within a set period to consider admission of the appeal, with a stay of recovery for the remaining dues. The case involved the interpretation of construction of complex services under the Finance Act, 1994, specifically related to a Project Development Agreement for residential facilities for the Commonwealth Games, 2010, with the Delhi Development Authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of tax liability, time bar issues, and valuation methods during the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1051 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s arguments insufficient for a full waiver of pre-deposit of a significant Service Tax liability and penalties under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant was directed to pay a specified amount within a set period to consider admission of the appeal, with a stay of recovery for the remaining dues. The case involved the interpretation of construction of complex services under the Finance Act, 1994, specifically related to a Project Development Agreement for residential facilities for the Commonwealth Games, 2010, with the Delhi Development Authority. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed examination of tax liability, time bar issues, and valuation methods during the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>