<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328066</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit for services used at different units within the same company. The Tribunal emphasized that genuine credit earned by one unit should not be disallowed for set-off against the liability of another unit within the same company, provided there is no prohibition by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1047 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328066</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit for services used at different units within the same company. The Tribunal emphasized that genuine credit earned by one unit should not be disallowed for set-off against the liability of another unit within the same company, provided there is no prohibition by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>