<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1042 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328061</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondent to release the petitioner&#039;s bond and bank guarantee of Rs. 43,27,338/-, provided during the provisional release of seized goods. Despite the petitioner fulfilling requirements and depositing fines and penalties as per Settlement Commission&#039;s orders, the respondent delayed the release. The Court emphasized prompt action, ordering the respondent to dispose of the matter within a week without adjournment due to lack of information on any writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders. The writ petition and application were disposed of, safeguarding the petitioner&#039;s rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 08:37:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1042 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328061</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondent to release the petitioner&#039;s bond and bank guarantee of Rs. 43,27,338/-, provided during the provisional release of seized goods. Despite the petitioner fulfilling requirements and depositing fines and penalties as per Settlement Commission&#039;s orders, the respondent delayed the release. The Court emphasized prompt action, ordering the respondent to dispose of the matter within a week without adjournment due to lack of information on any writ petition challenging the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders. The writ petition and application were disposed of, safeguarding the petitioner&#039;s rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>