<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3594</link>
    <description>Section 6(6)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was construed in line with the earlier 1922 Act provision and the settled taxpayer-favourable approach to ambiguous taxing statutes. The Court held that the definition of &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; operates conjunctively for ordinary residence: an assessee remains &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; if either statutory condition is not satisfied, namely not being resident in India in nine of the ten preceding previous years or not being in India for 730 days or more in the seven preceding previous years. On that interpretation, the assessee was entitled to &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; status, and the contrary view of the High Court and authorities below was incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 14:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3594</link>
      <description>Section 6(6)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was construed in line with the earlier 1922 Act provision and the settled taxpayer-favourable approach to ambiguous taxing statutes. The Court held that the definition of &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; operates conjunctively for ordinary residence: an assessee remains &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; if either statutory condition is not satisfied, namely not being resident in India in nine of the ten preceding previous years or not being in India for 730 days or more in the seven preceding previous years. On that interpretation, the assessee was entitled to &quot;not ordinarily resident&quot; status, and the contrary view of the High Court and authorities below was incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>