<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1035 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. It affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on loss claims, depreciation, and provisions written back. Additionally, it upheld the application of Section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax based on the profit declared in the original return, rejecting the challenge based on fraudulent entries in the original return.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1035 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objections. It affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on loss claims, depreciation, and provisions written back. Additionally, it upheld the application of Section 115JB for Minimum Alternate Tax based on the profit declared in the original return, rejecting the challenge based on fraudulent entries in the original return.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>