<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3593</link>
    <description>SC held HC exceeded its reference jurisdiction by declaring the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings perverse where no such question was framed or referred; perversity of facts not raised before HC. Tribunal is final on facts and HC may inquire into perversity only if specifically referred. Consequently HC orders set aside, the decisions of CIT(A) and the Tribunal restored, penalty under s.271(1)(c) held not exigible, and the appeals allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3593</link>
      <description>SC held HC exceeded its reference jurisdiction by declaring the Tribunal&#039;s factual findings perverse where no such question was framed or referred; perversity of facts not raised before HC. Tribunal is final on facts and HC may inquire into perversity only if specifically referred. Consequently HC orders set aside, the decisions of CIT(A) and the Tribunal restored, penalty under s.271(1)(c) held not exigible, and the appeals allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>