<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328051</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Grounds number 3 and 4 were sent back for fresh adjudication, and the loss on demerger was permitted to be included in the computation of book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the loss on demerger was correctly debited to the profit and loss account and should be the starting point for computing book profit. The Assessing Officer&#039;s dispute over the accounting treatment was deemed incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328051</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Grounds number 3 and 4 were sent back for fresh adjudication, and the loss on demerger was permitted to be included in the computation of book profit under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the loss on demerger was correctly debited to the profit and loss account and should be the starting point for computing book profit. The Assessing Officer&#039;s dispute over the accounting treatment was deemed incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>