<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1030 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, reversing the deletion of penalties under Section 271D and confirming penalties under Section 271E. The judgment highlighted the lack of reasonable cause for the cash transactions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and justifying the imposition of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1030 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, reversing the deletion of penalties under Section 271D and confirming penalties under Section 271E. The judgment highlighted the lack of reasonable cause for the cash transactions, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions and justifying the imposition of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>