<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1029 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the professional income should not be classified as salary income. The claimed expenditures against the professional income were deemed legitimate. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude the professional income from the salary income and allow the claimed expenditures. The appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 were granted in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 22:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1029 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the professional income should not be classified as salary income. The claimed expenditures against the professional income were deemed legitimate. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude the professional income from the salary income and allow the claimed expenditures. The appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2007-08 were granted in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>