<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1016 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the provision for special discount, depreciation on UPS, and provision for sales return. The Tribunal allowed the business expenditure on advances written off but upheld the disallowance of certain bad debts due to lack of details. The claim for license fees was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 08:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1016 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both the Revenue&#039;s and the assessee&#039;s appeals. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the provision for special discount, depreciation on UPS, and provision for sales return. The Tribunal allowed the business expenditure on advances written off but upheld the disallowance of certain bad debts due to lack of details. The claim for license fees was dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>