<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer had conducted thorough inquiries and applied his mind to the issues raised. The Tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of revenue loss or erroneous application of law, thereby restoring the original assessment order and allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 08:24:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1015 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the Assessing Officer had conducted thorough inquiries and applied his mind to the issues raised. The Tribunal concluded that there was no evidence of revenue loss or erroneous application of law, thereby restoring the original assessment order and allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>