<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1011 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328030</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided a bona fide explanation for the mistakes in income disclosure and had paid taxes before detection by the Assessing Officer. As a result, no penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was imposed. The decision was pronounced on 19th April 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2016 08:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1011 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328030</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, setting aside the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the appellant provided a bona fide explanation for the mistakes in income disclosure and had paid taxes before detection by the Assessing Officer. As a result, no penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was imposed. The decision was pronounced on 19th April 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>