<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1010 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, allowing deductions for security deposits, sales tax paid under protest, excess depreciation, electricity expenses, and labour expenses. It reversed the disallowance of port charges and remanded the issue of long-term capital gains computation for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider actual business expenses and correct valuations in determining taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1010 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on most issues, allowing deductions for security deposits, sales tax paid under protest, excess depreciation, electricity expenses, and labour expenses. It reversed the disallowance of port charges and remanded the issue of long-term capital gains computation for fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider actual business expenses and correct valuations in determining taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>