<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 621 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182956</link>
    <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act excludes the time requisite for obtaining a certified copy even where the copy application is made after the original limitation period has expired, because the statute does not require the application itself to be filed within time. Read with Section 29(2), this exclusion applies to limitation under a special law unless expressly excluded. On the rent control issue, the special statute allowed the High Court to grant only a limited further period on sufficient cause, and once the copy time was excluded the revision petitions fell within the statutory outer limit. The discussion concludes that the delay could be condoned within that ceiling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 621 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182956</link>
      <description>Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act excludes the time requisite for obtaining a certified copy even where the copy application is made after the original limitation period has expired, because the statute does not require the application itself to be filed within time. Read with Section 29(2), this exclusion applies to limitation under a special law unless expressly excluded. On the rent control issue, the special statute allowed the High Court to grant only a limited further period on sufficient cause, and once the copy time was excluded the revision petitions fell within the statutory outer limit. The discussion concludes that the delay could be condoned within that ceiling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>