<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 659 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182951</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, determining that the Technical Committee&#039;s recommendation for resitement of the appellants&#039; petrol pumps was not a binding order on the DDA. The Court held that the appellants lacked a substantive legitimate expectation under the 1999 policy, which was overridden by the 2003 policy change. The DDA&#039;s decision to apply the new policy and refuse resitement was upheld as fair and reasonable, aligning with public interest considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2023 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 659 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182951</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the appeal, determining that the Technical Committee&#039;s recommendation for resitement of the appellants&#039; petrol pumps was not a binding order on the DDA. The Court held that the appellants lacked a substantive legitimate expectation under the 1999 policy, which was overridden by the 2003 policy change. The DDA&#039;s decision to apply the new policy and refuse resitement was upheld as fair and reasonable, aligning with public interest considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>