https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182949 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Government Resolution dated March 22, 1968, regarding seniority principles in the BRO, deeming them reasonable and not violative of constitutional provisions. However, it dismissed the writ petition due to undue delay in challenging the Resolution. The Court found the equating of posts and seniority principles justified, except for discrepancies in the preparation of seniority lists, directing their revision in line with legal principles. The appeal was allowed in part, with costs to be borne by the parties. en-us Tue, 08 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 May 2016 15:40:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182949 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Government Resolution dated March 22, 1968, regarding seniority principles in the BRO, deeming them reasonable and not violative of constitutional provisions. However, it dismissed the writ petition due to undue delay in challenging the Resolution. The Court found the equating of posts and seniority principles justified, except for discrepancies in the preparation of seniority lists, directing their revision in line with legal principles. The appeal was allowed in part, with costs to be borne by the parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182949