https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182928 The Court upheld the constitutionality of Clause (5) of Article 15, finding it to be an enabling provision ensuring equality of opportunity in education without abrogating rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21. It concluded that the distinction between aided and unaided institutions must be considered, and the exclusion of minority institutions from Clause (5) is justified to protect their minority character. Regarding Article 21A, the Court held that it imposes an obligation on the State, allowing for laws including private unaided institutions without violating their rights under Article 19(1)(g), except for the 2009 Act's application to minority institutions, deemed ultra vires. en-us Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182928 The Court upheld the constitutionality of Clause (5) of Article 15, finding it to be an enabling provision ensuring equality of opportunity in education without abrogating rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21. It concluded that the distinction between aided and unaided institutions must be considered, and the exclusion of minority institutions from Clause (5) is justified to protect their minority character. Regarding Article 21A, the Court held that it imposes an obligation on the State, allowing for laws including private unaided institutions without violating their rights under Article 19(1)(g), except for the 2009 Act's application to minority institutions, deemed ultra vires. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182928