<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Allows Expenditure Claim After AO Fails to Prove Service Charges to &#039;Nova&#039; Were Unjustified or Returned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29400</link>
    <description>Disallowance of Service Charges paid - where professional services were not rendered by ‘Nova’ or whetger any money in respect of the payments to ‘Nova’ had flown back to the assessee - AO filed to prove its case - claim of expenditure allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:30:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Allows Expenditure Claim After AO Fails to Prove Service Charges to &#039;Nova&#039; Were Unjustified or Returned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29400</link>
      <description>Disallowance of Service Charges paid - where professional services were not rendered by ‘Nova’ or whetger any money in respect of the payments to ‘Nova’ had flown back to the assessee - AO filed to prove its case - claim of expenditure allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:30:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=29400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>