<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1001 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328020</link>
    <description>The case involved a cement manufacturing company denied Cenvat credit for telephone/mobile phone and courier services. The Adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals) initially upheld the denial. However, citing a precedent involving similar services, the Bench allowed the credit for telephone/mobile phone and courier services, considering their use in manufacturing and commercial activities. The demand and penalty for these services were set aside. Repair and maintenance services for staff quarters were also deemed eligible for credit due to a bona fide belief. The appellants were granted relief, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1001 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328020</link>
      <description>The case involved a cement manufacturing company denied Cenvat credit for telephone/mobile phone and courier services. The Adjudicating authority and Commissioner (Appeals) initially upheld the denial. However, citing a precedent involving similar services, the Bench allowed the credit for telephone/mobile phone and courier services, considering their use in manufacturing and commercial activities. The demand and penalty for these services were set aside. Repair and maintenance services for staff quarters were also deemed eligible for credit due to a bona fide belief. The appellants were granted relief, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>