<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 996 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for the recovery of Cenvat credit on Sponge Iron lost in a fire incident, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Department&#039;s reliance on the insurance claim as the basis for denying the credit was deemed insufficient, as the appellant&#039;s statutory records demonstrated the raw materials were used for their intended purpose despite the damage compensated by the insurance company. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence of total loss and upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 10:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=429349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 996 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order for the recovery of Cenvat credit on Sponge Iron lost in a fire incident, ruling in favor of the appellant. The Department&#039;s reliance on the insurance claim as the basis for denying the credit was deemed insufficient, as the appellant&#039;s statutory records demonstrated the raw materials were used for their intended purpose despite the damage compensated by the insurance company. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence of total loss and upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=328015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>